Dawn_C wrote:
Headframe Hunters wrote:
I'd love to see statutes referenced regarding entering mines, especially those on BLM or USFS land which is otherwise unrestricted to entry. I suspect that you may be mixing up patented versus unpatented claims, and do not understand the fact that unpatented claims do not restrict physical access, other than that which causes property damage (breaking and entering), or that which is restricted by 30 CFR for active mines falling under the purview of MSHA.
In the eyes of the law, those statutes are regardless of what mine it is or whether its active or dormant. Please do not try to tell me the statutes of anything since i have mentioned earlier that i am involved in the law enforecement field (in ways i cannot and will not say) but believe me i DO know the laws. My suggestion to you is to study the statutes of Arizona again, and not just regarding mining statutes but also in TRESPASSING statutes. These also outline mines!
And just FYI, any open mines ON BLM and/or Forest Service properties ARE restricted and you CAN be arrested for entering. This is where the statutes on TRESPASS come into play. If you notice when they 'barr up' mines with fences or whatever, they also post DO NOT ENTER or NO TRESPASSING signs. Why do you think they do this??? Because its ILLEGAL to enter, Thats why. Those mines that do not have signage or closures in any way does not at all mean they are not included in the NO TRESPASS statute! It just means those mines have not yet been reclaimed yet and closed. As i have said in prior posts right in this very thread, i have personally witnessed people being arrested for entering mines on BLM AND USFS administrated lands. All we did was sit and wait until the persons came out of the mines then on the handcuffs went so again dont try telling me that entering mines is UNRESTRICTED. This goes for ANY mines, whether patented or UNpatented. Only the statutes are in different areas of the book.
Quote:
Unpatented claims control mineral rights only.
I believe i mentioned all of this and even thouroghly explained in in a prior posting.
Quote:
You are operating some of your properties, right? If these are under an LLC or other entity, you'd be wise to understand 30 CFR or risk opening yourself up to fines for unsafe operation, lack of employee training, or other issues. Given as none of your operations show up on the MSHA MDRS for Arizona as of a few days ago, a problem may exist here.
Does not apply to me. Thats ONLY if you have employees in which i do not. I know all about the MSHA, OSHA, ADEQ and other various agencies that are involved with mining operations, but again, none of these apply to me since they do not regulate private party mining operations, only mining operations that fall under corporation titles. Private party operations cannot do nearly as much environmental damage as the large corporation mining operations can and do, thus is why those agencies usually dont bother with private parties, Also, I do not recall mentioning previously that i was under an LLC or corporation title, thus again your arguement is totally irrelevent and i have no 'problems'.
Lastly, i never mentioned what my operations are or were, nor did i give or offer any information as to the names of my operations or how i operate my operations, or where my operations (coordinates) are in Arizona,thus, of course, you would not find it on record. Also, wouldnt you need my full name in order for anything to show on a record???
Your argument still remains irrelevent.
Quote:
I also find it interesting that you call for him to leave old equipment in mines for use by future miners, but also call said equipment "government property". Which is it?
Thats EXACTLY what i said! He admitted he was STEALING. He also stated that the mines are not privately owned in BC, meaning there is no such thing as patenting, which only means it HAS to be government property... thus hes stealing... FROM the government! Isnt that enough to be self-explanatory?
Now, with all of this said, if you wish to take me on further, and THINK you can win, then lets do it! Im all up for the game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abfa2/abfa2f5ac8818b0469c4345a77e91018f378ae7b" alt="Smile :)"
Quote:
Again, you are failing to name specific statues restricting access to abandoned mines. Please find and cite, or stop wasting my time with hearsay.
I dont need to find and cite ANYTHING to you. As i said they are all in the lawbooks. All you have to do is locate them, otherwise do not continue wasting MY time!
Quote:
I have never once seen a bat-gated mine posted. I spend most of my time in Missouri, where bat-gating mines is so uncommon as to be a non-issue (I know of two complexes with bat gates installed, one is one USFS property and the idiots they hired did it wrong and actually created a more hazardous situation than leaving that adit open), but my experiences out west indicate that mines on public land are not posted. Additionally, I'm impressed that you know of abandoned mines that are even remotely accessible to law enforcement! If, as it sounds like, you called LE and wasted hours of their time because some guys felt like going into a mine on PUBLIC land at their own risk, then you are part of the problem. The word 'busybody' comes to mind.
Dude, i never called ANYBODY! We was the ones that was called. A lot of people dont realize that the BLM AND the Forestry(and other agencies) runs choppers and planes around different states surveying and mapping the lands(especially mine sites) they administer and the pilots fly low enough to be able to see people being in places they are not suppose to be. Most complaints regarding things on public lands does not come from the people thats out there ON the public lands but from the BLM, USFS or geological survey pilots themselves!
Quote:
I don't need specific operation names to find what MSHA lists as active, and if you think otherwise, you are very unfamiliar with the mining industry and what laws and regulations govern it.
I know more than you think i do.. and it isnt MSHA that does those listings, its MRDS. Its obvious you dont even know what MHSA stands for or even what it does. It certainly DOES NOT list active or non-active mines.
Quote:
I suppose I could go through the LR2000 database and find all of your claims; your name is not relevant for that.
Idiot, you STILL need names and parcel numbers PLUS locations in order to get info like that! Good luck on trying to find it without names, parcel numbers, locations, etc. I do not have CLAIMS, i never said i did. i said i have PATENTS!
Quote:
Seems you must be as bad as he is, otherwise you wouldnt be on this thread trying to protect him.
I don't take equipment without the mine owner/operator's consent. I actually know him indirectly elsewhere; he works with mine owners when applicable.
Shall we find out about you also? If the right info comes across the table, you just may be on your way to jail just like he may be. He never once mentioned anything about MINE OWNERS, he simply said there are no MINE OWNERS in Canada, only CLAIMANTS. CLAIMANTS are not OWNERS, they are only CLAIMANTS. Again hes stealing from the canadian government!